4.4 Article

Rapid myeloid recovery as a possible mechanism of whole-body radioadaptive response

期刊

RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 170, 期 3, 页码 307-315

出版社

RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1667/RR1146.1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the mechanism underlying the radioadaptive response that rescues mice from hematopoietic failure. C57BL/6 mice were irradiated with low-dose acute X rays (0.5 Gy) for priming 2 weeks; prior to a high-dose (6 Gy) challenge irradiation. Bone marrow cells, erythrocytes and platelets in low-dose-preirradiated mice showed earlier recovery after the challenge irradiation than those in mice subjected only to the challenge irradiation. This suggests that hematopoiesis is enhanced after a challenge irradiation in preirradiated mice. The rapid recovery of bone marrow cells after the challenge irradiation was consistent with the proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors expressing the cell surface markers Lin(-), Sca-1(-) and c-Kit(+) in low-dose-preirradiated mice. A subpopulation of myeloid (Mac-1(+)/Gr-1(+)) cells, which were descendants of Lin(-), Sca-1(-) and c-Kit(+) cells, rapidly recovered in the bone marrow oflow-dose-preirradiated mice, whereas the number of B-lymphoid (CD19(+)/B220(+)) cells did not show a statistically significant increase. Plasma cytokine profiles were analyzed using antibody arrays, and results indicated that the concentrations of several growth factors for myelopoiesis after the challenge irradiation were considerably increased by low-dose preirradiation. The rapid recovery of erythrocytes and platelets but not leukocytes was observed in the peripheral blood of preirradiated mice, suggesting that low-dose preirradiation triggered the differentiation to myelopoiesis. Thus the adaptive response induced by low-dose preirradiation in terms of the recovery kinetics of the number of hematopoietic cells may be due to the rapid recovery of the number of myeloid cells after high-dose irradiation. (c) 2008 by Radiation Research Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据