4.4 Article

Laboratory fading rates of various luminescence signals from feldspar-rich sediment extracts

期刊

RADIATION MEASUREMENTS
卷 43, 期 9-10, 页码 1474-1486

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.06.002

关键词

Optically stimulated luminescence; Sedimentary feldspar; Fading rate; Elevated temperature stimulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feldspar as a retrospective dosimeter is receiving more and more attention because of its useful luminescence properties; in particular the dose response curve extends to significantly higher doses than quartz. However, feldspars have one major disadvantage; both the thermoluminescence (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signals exhibit anomalous (athermal) fading. Much of the OSL work carried out on feldspars in recent years has focussed on determining fading rates and correcting for them. Almost all work has been carried out using IR stimulation at 50 degrees C detected in the blue region of the spectrum. In contrast, we have determined fading rates for various sedimentary feldspar samples using different stimulation and detection windows. If the initial part of the OSL signal is used the lowest fading rate is observed with post-IR blue stimulation (UV detection), but if a later part of the signal is used the lowest fading rate is obtained for IR stimulation (blue detection). Daylight bleaching experiments show that, unlike quartz, the initial and final parts of the feldspar OSL signal bleach at approximately the same rate. Stimulation at elevated temperatures significantly reduces the apparent fading rate. This signal appears to bleach more rapidly in daylight than the signal observed when stimulation is at 50 degrees C (for IR stimulation and blue detection). We conclude that there are OSL signals from sedimentary feldspars which fade at a significantly lower rate than the signal used conventionally, and that further testing of these signals is warranted to see if they are dosimetrically useful. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据