4.7 Article

When the carbon being dated is not what you think it is: Insights from phytolith carbon research

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 162-174

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.007

关键词

Phytolith occluded carbon; C-14 dating; SEM-EDX; 3D X-ray; NanoSIMS; Raman spectroscopy; DNP-NMR; C-13 labelling

资金

  1. Keck-Carbon Cycle AMS Facility at University of California Irvine
  2. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1144888]
  3. OSU-Institut Pytheas (Aix-Marseille Universite-CNRS-IRD)
  4. French FIR 2010 (Aix-Marseille Universite)
  5. ECCOREV 2011
  6. AIR Archeometrie 2011(CNRS)
  7. Labex OT-Med 2013

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For proper interpretation of radiocarbon (C-14) age results, the carbon fraction being dated must be identified beforehand, ideally as a single homogeneous entity that best represents the event being studied. Radiocarbon dating of fossil phytoliths (biosilica formed in living higher-plants) has been used in a number of archaeology and paleoenvironmental studies. More precisely, the carbon occlusion (phytC) has been C-14 dated. This method relies on the phytC being photosynthetic in origin, so that its C-14 signature is similar to that of the host plant. However, we have recently presented overwhelming evidence that phytC in modern plants is made up of a mixture of carbon photosynthesized by the plant (from atmospheric CO2) and soil carbon comprised of multiple C-14 signatures (ages). The discussion presented here is based on our assessments of phytC C-14 signatures, their chemical nature, location, origin and fate as well as the current state of knowledge on plant cell silica interactions with biomolecules. Finally, regardless of the fact that there are cases where fossil phytC C-14 results appear to match expected values, the impossibility of establishing a priori either the amount of the soil carbon contribution to phytC or the mean C-14 age of its occluded mixed pool precludes the use of phytoliths as a reliable C-14 dating tool. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据