4.7 Article

The diversification of eastern South American open vegetation biomes: Historical biogeography and perspectives

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 30, 期 13-14, 页码 1630-1648

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.03.009

关键词

South America; Open vegetations; Seasonally dry tropical forests; Cerrado; Chaco; Caatinga; Biogeography; Zoogeography

资金

  1. CAPES/Fulbright
  2. Brigham Young University (BYU) Department of Biology
  3. National Geographic Society (NGS)
  4. Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB)
  5. Neotropical Grassland Conservancy (NGC)
  6. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SSAR)
  7. Idea Wild

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eastern-central South American open vegetation biomes occur across an extensive range of environmental conditions and are organized diagonally including three complexly interacting tropical/subtropical biomes. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (SDTFs), Cerrado, and Chaco biomes are seasonally stressed by drought, characterized by significant plant and animal endemism, high levels of diversity, and highly endangered. However, these open biomes have been overlooked in biogeographic studies and conservation projects in South America, especially regarding fauna studies. Here I compile and evaluate the biogeographic hypotheses previously proposed for the diversification of these three major open biomes, specifically their distributions located eastern and southern of Andes. My goal is to generate predictions and provide a background for testable hypotheses. I begin by investigating both continental (inter-biome) and regional (within-biome) levels, and I then provide a biogeographical summary for these regions. I also suggest how novel molecular-based historical biogeographic/phylogeographic approaches could contribute to the resolution of long-standing questions, identify potential target fauna groups for development of these lines of study, and describe fertile future research agendas. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据