4.2 Article

Holocene history and environmental reconstruction of a Hercynian mire and surrounding mountain landscape based on multiple proxies

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 107-120

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2014.04.017

关键词

Fen-bog transition; Macrofossils; Pollen; Testate amoebae; Transfer function; 8.2 ka event; Water level; pH; Ellenberg indicator values

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GA206/08/0389]
  2. Czech Academy of Science [RVO 67985939]
  3. Masaryk University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discovered the first peat section covering the entire Holocene in the Hruby Jesenik Mountains, representing an island of unique alpine vegetation whose history may display transitional features between the Hercynian and Carpathian regions. We analysed pollen, plant macrofossils (more abundant in bottom layers), testate amoebae (more abundant in upper layers), peat stratigraphy and chemistry. We found that the landscape development indeed differed from other Hercynian mountains located westward. This is represented by Pinus cembra and Larix during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition, the early expansion of spruce around 10,450 cal yr BP, and survival of Larix during the climatic optimum. The early Holocene climatic fluctuations are traced in our profile by species compositions of both the mire and surrounding forests. The mire started to develop as a calcium-rich percolation fen with some species recently considered to be postglacial relicts (Meesia triquetra, Betula nana), shifted into ombrotrophy around 7450 cal yr BP by autogenic succession and changed into a pauperised, nutrient-enriched spruce woodland due to modern forestry activities. We therefore concluded that its recent vegetation is not a product of natural processes. From a methodological viewpoint we demonstrated how using multiple biotic proxies and extensive training sets in transfer functions may overcome taphonomic problems. (C) 2014 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据