4.4 Article

Analysis of lengths, water areas and volumes of the Three Gorges Reservoir at different water levels using Landsat images and SRTM DEM data

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 304, 期 -, 页码 115-125

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.03.041

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB955903]
  2. International Cooperation Project [2010DFA21340]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41105053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impoundment and operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) are geophysical controlled experiments. However, detailed procedures, data source and uncertainties on TGR's basic parameters, such as lengths, water areas and volumes, were not available to the science community, and are provided in this study by using Landsat images, SRTM DEM data and in situ measurements. Reservoir lengths are between 650 km and 700 km at the water level of 175 m above sea level (a.s.l.). The natural (but near maximum) water area of the Yangtze River within the reservoir (at the full range of 699 km) based on Landsat images was 489 km(2) in August, 2002, before the impoundment. At 175 m a.s.l., the total water area mapped by Landsat images (929 km(2)) is similar to 10% less than those derived from SRTM DEM data (1006 km(2)) and reported by Three Gorges Corporation (TGC) (1040 km(2)). SRTM DEM data could classify 90-92% of these areas as water areas, while the total areas from Landsat, SRTM and TGC have over 96% agreements at water levels <= 170 m. The larger estimate of water area by DEM data from both TGC and SRTM at 175 m could be partially explained by the construction of levees. The total static volumes derived from SRTM DEM data above 70 m have a linear relationship (R-2 = 0.99, Mean Absolute Difference = 0.43 km(3)) with those reported by the Information Center of Water Resource (ICWR), Ministry of Water Resource, China. The analysis also suggests that the ICWR-reported water volumes in the reservoir neglect the wedge storage in a flooding peak. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据