4.4 Article

Atmospheric carbon isotope signatures in phytolith-occluded carbon

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 20-29

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.11.013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method of deriving an atmospheric delta(CO2)-C-13 record using phytolith-occluded carbon as a proxy is described here. The method is designed to measure carbon-13 in ancient phytolith-occluded carbon and convert this signal into an atmospheric carbon record of the atmosphere. Phytoliths are very small particles of silica (between 5 and 100 pm) that form distinctive and repeatable shapes in most plants. When phytoliths form within a plant, some of the host organic matter is trapped inside the phytolith. Phytoliths have been shown to contain occluded carbon, and are present in most terrestrial sedimentary deposits. Moreover, because they survive well in most soils and sediments, the trapped carbon remains intact, and preserved from contamination and alteration. When plants assimilate atmospheric CO2 they fractionate against C-13, leaving the atmosphere relatively enriched in C-13. Therefore any record of isotopic change in plant tissue can be used as a proxy for change in atmospheric (CO2)-C-13. Experiments were conducted to characterise and measure the natural variability of modern phytolith-occluded carbon. These included measurement of carbon isotopic fractionation effects between the atmosphere and whole plant material, measurement of carbon isotope fractionation between whole plant matter and phytolith-occluded carbon, and a determination of carbon compounds present in phytolith-occluded carbon. A formula was developed and applied to separate the plant physiological factors and the embedded atmospheric (CO2)-C-13 from the phytolith-occluded carbon. Thereby, demonstrating that it is possible to derive modern atmospheric (CO2)-C-13 values from phytolith carbon. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据