4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Establishing a luminescence chronology for a palaeosol-loess profile at Tokaj (Hungary): A comparison of quartz OSL and polymineral IRSL signals

期刊

QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 68-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.02.018

关键词

Loess; Hungary; OSL; SAR; Post-IR IRSL; Bleaching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comparative study of quartz OSL, polymineral IRSL at low temperature (50 degrees C, IR50) and post-IR elevated temperature (290 degrees C) IRSL (pIRIR(290)) feldspar dating on nine samples from the Tokaj loess section in NE Hungary (SE Europe). Preheat plateau tests show a drop in quartz OSL De between 160 and 240 degrees C but above 240 degrees C a clear D-e plateau is present. Quartz OSL SAR is shown to be generally appropriate to these samples (recycling, recuperation) but a satisfactory dose recovery result was only obtained when a dose was added to a sample without any prior optical or thermal pre-treatment; this gave a dose recovery ratio of 1.04 +/- 0.05 after subtracting the natural dose from the measured dose. The pIRIR(290) SAR protocol also results in acceptable dose recovery results for the pIRIR(290) signal (1.08 +/- 0.01) when a large dose is added to the natural dose. Bleaching experiments suggest a detectable non-bleachable residual pIRIR(290) dose of 10 +/- 4 Gy. Agreement with quartz OSL ages is best achieved by correcting the IR50 ages for fading; however this is not necessary when using the pIRIR(290) signal. With respect to Hungarian Late Quaternary geology our results indicate that the major part of the Tokaj loess has been deposited during MIS 3(60-24 ka), with periods of soil formation occurring during the onset of MIS 3 (>= 58 ka) and between about 35 and 25 ka. Our results also indicate episodic deposition of loess and varying, non-linear sedimentation rates during MIS 3. Proxy analyses in the literature are based on the traditional concept of continuous deposition; in the light of our new data the use of such simple assumptions must be reconsidered. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据