4.2 Article

The potential of using K-rich feldspars for optical dating of young coastal sediments - A test case from Darss-Zingst peninsula (southern Baltic Sea coast)

期刊

QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 207-222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.10.001

关键词

Optical dating; Feldspar; Quartz; Elevated temperature post-IR IR SAR protocol; Coastal sediments; Subtraction dating

资金

  1. Leibniz-Pakt fur Innovation und Forschung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential use of a modified elevated temperature post-IR IR (pIRIR) SAR protocol for K-rich feldspar was tested for seven late Pleistocene and Holocene samples from a coastal sediment succession from the southern Baltic Sea (Darss-Zingst peninsula). This modified pIRIR protocol observes a pIRIR signal at 180 degrees C after the IRSL measurement at 50 degrees C. After thorough performance testing, equivalent doses (D-e) were measured and corrected for the residual doses and fading. The results showed that thermal transfer and residual doses are more significant for pIRIR signal than for quartz OSL and IRSL signal. The calculated K-feldspar ages (IRSL and pIRIR) were then compared with quartz-SAR and two independent radiocarbon ages. The ages of the investigated sediments range from the late Pleistocene (similar to 13.5 ka) to a few hundred years. The laboratory-fading rate of the pIRIR signal was significantly lower (g-value of 0-2%/decade) than that of the IRSL (g-values of 3-10%/decade). We observed a systematic overestimation of fading-corrected IRSL ages based on high g-values (> 5%), whereas the pIRIR ages showed a good agreement with the quartz ages and with the radiocarbon ages for the well-bleached mid-Holocene and the late Pleistocene samples. suggesting that our modified pIRIR protocol is suitable for well-bleached young sediments. For the incompletely bleached uppermost samples the minimum age model (MAM) was applied. For these samples it is concluded that both IRSL and pIRIR ages derived from K-feldspar overestimated the true burial age. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据