4.6 Article

Impact of subgrid-scale vertical turbulentmixing on eyewall asymmetric structures andmesovortices of hurricanes

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2147

关键词

turbulent mixing; hurricane; eyewall

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-0847332]
  2. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0847332] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the multiple nested state-of-the-art Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is used to investigate the impact of the subgrid-scale (SGS) vertical turbulent mixing parametrization on hurricane eyewall asymmetric structures and the formation of eyewall mesovortices. Hurricane Isabel (2003) was simulated by a series of numerical experiments with different SGS vertical turbulent mixing parametrizations including the Yonsei University, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino 2.5 level and Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino 3 level schemes. The simulations show that the vertical turbulent mixing scheme not only substantially affects the SGS vertical transport of heat and moisture but also has an important bearing on the storm axisymmetric structure, eyewall mesovortices and other resolved asymmetric features in the vicinity of the hurricane eyewall. The analyses show that the vertical turbulent mixing processes provide a mechanism to affect the barotropic instability for generation of eyewall mesovortices through changing the vortex basic state potential vorticity (PV) field and generating eyewall disturbances with different frequencies. Our numerical experiments show for given external conditions that the magnitude and vertical distribution of the eddy exchange coefficients are the key factors that regulate the characteristics of eyewall disturbances. Such a modulation of eyewall structure by the eddy exchange coefficients is realized through the complicated interaction among SGS vertical turbulent mixing, mesoscale structures, diabatic heating and barotropic instability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据