4.2 Article

Specific features of the behaviour of targets under negative pressures created by a picosecond laser pulse

期刊

QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 246-251

出版社

TURPION LTD
DOI: 10.1070/QE2013v043n03ABEH015106

关键词

laser radiation; picosecond duration; ablation pressure; shock wave; negative pressure; spallation phenomenon; strain rate; ultimate strength; numerical modelling

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-02-12003-ofi_m-2011, 11-08-01225, 12-02-00625-a, 12-02-00746-a]
  2. programme 'Extreme Light Fields and Their Applications' of the Presidium of RAS [13P]
  3. programme 'Matter at High Densities of Energy' of the Presidium of RAS [2P]
  4. President Grants for Government Support of the Leading Scientific Schools of the Russian Federation [NSh-368.2012.2, NSh-7241.2012.2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New experimental data are obtained concerning the character of spallation and the mechanical strength of targets made of aluminium, aluminium-magnesium alloy (AMg6M), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, plexiglass), tantalum, copper, tungsten, palladium, silicon, and lead under the impact of laser radiation with the duration 70 ps. The specific features of the spallation phenomenon, in which the separation of a part of the target substance occurs at the back surface as a result of the effect of negative pressures (tensile stresses) in the substance, are experimentally studied. To determine the time moment of spallation, the electrocontact method of measuring the velocity of the spalled layer is developed and implemented. The obtained results show that the values of spall strength of the studied materials at moderate amplitudes of the shock-wave effect agree with the known literature data, while at higher pressures the growth of spall strength is observed, which is an evidence of the material hardening. The results of the studies demonstrate that the dynamic strength of a substance depends on both the duration and the amplitude of the shock-wave impact on the target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据