4.5 Article

Associations between objectively assessed physical activity levels and fitness and self-reported health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1371-1378

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9875-x

关键词

Older adults; Physical fitness; Perceived health; Quality of life

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PTDC/DES/108780/2008, SFRH/BD/33124/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33124/2007, PTDC/DES/108780/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies investigated the associations between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-reported physical activity (PA) and/or self-reported physical fitness which are not the most reliable methods to assess PA and fitness. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations between HRQoL and each of objectively assessed habitual PA and physical fitness. Eighty-five community-dwelling older adults (60-83 years) completed assessments for PA (counts/min and steps/day using accelerometers), physical fitness (six-minute walk test [6MWT] and hand-grip strength), and self-reported HRQoL (using the eight subscales of the SF-36). In adjusted logistic regression models, the upper quartile was compared against the lower three quartiles of scores on each HRQoL subscale. Results report the odds ratios that were significant in the adjusted models at P < 0.05. Individuals with higher PA levels assessed by counts/min were more likely to score higher on physical functioning (PF) subscale (OR = 1.90). Individuals with superior 6MWT performance were more likely to score higher on PF (OR = 1.87), role limitations due to physical problems (RP) (OR = 1.95), and vitality (VT) (OR = 1.79). Individuals with superior hand-grip strength were more likely to score higher on RP (OR = 2.37) and VT (OR = 1.83). Objectively assessed PA and physical fitness measures were positively associated with physical health HRQoL subscales as reported by community-dwelling older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据