4.5 Article

Lifestyle and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1237-1245

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9855-1

关键词

Quality of life; Cancer survivors; Colorectal cancer; Health behaviours

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. University College London Hospitals
  3. University College London Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  4. British Heart Foundation
  5. Cancer Research UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As cancer survival rates improve, there is growing interest in the role of lifestyle in longer-term health and quality of life (QoL). This study examined the prevalence of health-related behaviours, and the associations between health behaviours and QoL, in colorectal cancer survivors. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer within the last 5 years identified from five London (UK) hospitals (N = 495) completed a survey that included measures of fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake, physical activity, smoking status and alcohol consumption. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used to index QoL. The majority of respondents were overweight/obese (58%), not physically active (< 5 bouts of moderate activity per week; 82%) and ate fewer than five portions of F&V a day (57%). Few were smokers (6%) or heavy drinkers (weekly alcohol units > 21 for men and > 14 for women; 8%). Physical activity showed the strongest association with functional QoL and was also associated with lower fatigue, pain and insomnia (P < 0.05). F&V intake was associated with higher global QoL and physical, role and cognitive function (P < 0.05). Using a total health behaviour score (calculated by assigning one point for each of the following behaviours: not smoking, consuming a parts per thousand yen5 portions of F&V a day, being physically active and having moderate alcohol consumption), there was a linear relationship with global QoL, physical function and fatigue (P < 0.05). A high proportion of colorectal cancer survivors in the UK have suboptimal health behaviours, and this is associated with poorer QoL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据