4.5 Article

Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 1035-1044

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0

关键词

Patient-reported outcomes; Social health; Social function; Social relationships; Item banks

资金

  1. Statistical Coordinating Center (Northwestern University, PI) [U01AR52177]
  2. Duke University, PI [U01AR52186]
  3. University of North Carolina, PI [U01AR52181]
  4. University of Pittsburgh, PI [U01AR52155]
  5. Stanford University, PI [U01AR52186, U01AR52158]
  6. Stony Brook University, PI [U01AR52170]
  7. University of Washington, PI [U01AR52171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop a social health measurement framework, to test items in diverse populations and to develop item response theory (IRT) item banks. A literature review guided framework development of Social Function and Social Relationships sub-domains. Items were revised based on patient feedback, and Social Function items were field-tested. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), two-parameter IRT modeling and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF). The analytic sample included 956 general population respondents who answered 56 Ability to Participate and 56 Satisfaction with Participation items. EFA and CFA identified three Ability to Participate sub-domains. However, because of positive and negative wording, and content redundancy, many items did not fit the IRT model, so item banks do not yet exist. EFA, CFA and IRT identified two preliminary Satisfaction item banks. One item exhibited trivial age DIF. After extensive item preparation and review, EFA-, CFA- and IRT-guided item banks help provide increased measurement precision and flexibility. Two Satisfaction short forms are available for use in research and clinical practice. This initial validation study resulted in revised item pools that are currently undergoing testing in new clinical samples and populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据