4.5 Article

Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: results from a population-based study

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 37-46

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9571-2

关键词

Epidemiology; Noise; Noise annoyance; Gender; Health-related quality of life

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [4026-28099, 3347CO-108796, 3247BO-104283, 3247BO-104288, 3247BO-104284, 32-65896.01, 32-59302.99, 32-52720.97, 32-4253.94]
  2. Federal Office for Forest, Environment and Landscape
  3. Federal Office of Public Health
  4. Federal Office of Roads and Transport
  5. Cantonal Governments of Aargau, Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft, Geneva, Lucerne, Ticino, Zurich
  6. Swiss Lung League
  7. cantonal Lung Leagues of Basel-Stadt/Basel-Landschaft, Geneva, Ticino and Zurich

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To estimate the impact of traffic-related noise annoyance on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in a population-based study and potential effect modification by gender. The study included 5,021 participants of the Swiss Cohort Study of Air Pollution and Lung Disease in Adults second survey. The association between traffic-related noise annoyance, measured on an 11-point scale, and HrQoL, based on SF-36 scores, was investigated by multivariate regression analysis. Effect sizes were calculated, and interactions by gender and chronic disease status examined. Thirteen percentage of the study population reported high annoyance due to traffic. Women were more likely to report high noise annoyance (adjOR 1.23; 95%CI 1.01-1.48). Except for general health, all SF-36 scores showed a significant negative association with noise annoyance. The respective effect sizes ranged between 0.13 and 0.54. Significant effect modification by gender and chronic disease status was present in specific SF-36 domains. This paper presents first evidence of an inverse relationship of noise annoyance and HrQoL in a general population. Although the estimated effects are small to moderate for individuals, they may add up to a relevant public health impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据