4.5 Article

Which aspects of subjectively reported quality of life are important in predicting mortality beyond known risk factors? The Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 Study

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 81-90

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9718-1

关键词

WHOQOL-BREF; Self-reported health; Quality of life; Mortality

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. EPSRC
  3. ESRC
  4. MRC
  5. MRC [G0700704] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/505, ETM/55] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0700704B, G0700704] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate which aspects of Quality of Life (QoL) (physical health, psychological, social-relationships, and environment) are important in predicting mortality. A sample of 448 (194 men and 254 women) relatively healthy older adults reported their QoL using the WHOQOL-BREF. After a 9-year follow-up, survival analysis was carried out using Cox's proportional hazards regression. Only the General Health item (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.89) and Physical Health Domain mean score (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 86-0.95) significantly predicted mortality when controlling for age and sex. The single-item General Health measure was the stronger predictor of mortality and remained significant after socio-demographic, psychological (personality and cognition), health behaviour and health status measures were controlled for independently. When all measures were simultaneously controlled for, none of the items or domains on the WHOQOL-BREF significantly predicted mortality. Items addressing health-related QoL are the most important when predicting mortality. The findings support research demonstrating that subjectively rated, single-item general health questions accurately predict survival over and above socio-demographic, psychological, health behaviour and health status measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据