4.6 Article

Independent and conjoint associations of gout and hyperuricaemia with total and cardiovascular mortality

期刊

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 106, 期 7, 页码 647-658

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hct083

关键词

-

资金

  1. Graduate Entry Medical School, Strategic Research Fund, University of Limerick, Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gout and serum uric acid are associated with mortality but their simultaneous contributions have not been fully evaluated in the general population. Purpose: To explore the independent and conjoint relationships of gout and uric acid with mortality in the US population. Methods: Mortality risks of gout and serum uric acid were determined for 15 773 participants, aged 20 years or older, in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey by linking baseline information collected during 1988-1994 with mortality data up to 2006. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression determined adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each exposure and all analyses were conducted in 2011 and 2012. Results: Compared with subjects without a history of gout, the multivariable HR for subjects with gout were 1.42 (CI 1.12-1.82) for total and 1.58 (CI 1.13-2.19) for cardiovascular mortality. Adjusted HRs per 59.5 mu mol/l (1 mg/dl) increase in uric acid were 1.16 (CI 1.10-1.22) for total and cardiovascular mortality and this pattern was consistent across disease categories. In the conjoint analysis, the adjusted HRs for mortality in the highest two uric acid quartiles were 1.64 (CI 1.08-2.51) and 1.77 (CI 1.23-2.55), respectively, for subjects with gout, and were 1.09 (CI 0.87-1.37) and 1.37 (CI (1.11-1.70), respectively, for subjects without gout, compared with those without gout in the lowest quartile. A similar pattern emerged for cardiovascular mortality. Conclusions: Gout and serum uric acid independently associate with total and cardiovascular mortality. These risks increase with rising uric acid concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据