4.1 Article

Global Radiation-Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Black-Hole Accretion Flow and Outflow: Unified Model of Three States

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/61.3.L7

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; ISM: jets and outflows; magnetohydrodynamics: MHD; radiative transfer

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [20740115, 19340044]
  2. special postdoctoral researchers program of RIKEN (KO)
  3. JSPS [14740132]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [14740132, 20740115, 21244013] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black-hole accretion systems are known to possess several distinct modes (or spectral states), such as low/hard state and high/soft state. Since the dynamics of the corresponding flows is distinct, theoretical models were separately considered for each state. We here propose a unified model based on our new, global, two-dimensional radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations. By controlling a density normalization we could for the first time reproduce three distinct modes of accretion flow and outflow with one numerical code. When the density is large (model A), a geometrically thick, very luminous disk forms, in which photon trapping takes place. When the density is moderate (model B), the accreting gas can effectively be cooled by emitting radiation, thus generating a thin disk, i.e., a soft-state disk. When the density is too low for radiative cooling to be important (model C), a disk becomes hot, thick, and faint; i.e., a hard-state disk. The magnetic energy is amplified within the disk up to about twice, 30%, and 20% of the gas energy in models A, B, and C, respectively. Notably, the disk outflows with helical magnetic fields, which are driven either by radiation-pressure force or magnetic-pressure force, are ubiquitous in any accretion modes. Finally, our simulations are consistent with the phenomenological alpha-viscosity prescription; that is, the disk viscosity is proportional to the pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据