4.3 Article

Estimated vitamin D synthesis and dietary vitamin D intake among Asians in two distinct geographical locations (Kuala Lumpur, 3°N v. Aberdeen, 57°N) and climates

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 21, 期 17, 页码 3118-3124

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018002057

关键词

Sunlight exposure behaviour; UVB exposure; Polysulfone badges; Ethnic

资金

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [DPP-2013-100]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the contributions of UVB exposure and diet to total vitamin D among Asians living in Kuala Lumpur (KL) and Aberdeen (AB). Design: Longitudinal study. Setting:UVB exposure (using polysulfone film badges) and skin colour and dietary vitamin D intake (by web-based questionnaire) were measured at each season in AB and during south-west (SWM) and north-east monsoons (NEM) in KL. Subjects: One hundred and fifteen Asians in KL and eighty-five Asians in AB aged 20-50 years. Results Median summer UVB exposure of Asians in AB (0.25 SED/d) was higher than UVB exposure for the KL participants (SWM=0.20 SED/d, P = 0.02; NEM = 0.14 SED/d, P < 0.01). UVB exposure was the major source of vitamin D in KL year-round (60%) but only during summer in AB (59%). Median dietary vitamin D intake was higher in AB (3.50 mu g/d (140 IU/d)), year-round, than in KL (SWM = 2.05 mu g/d (82 IU/d); NEM = 1.83 mu g/d (73 IU/d), P < 0.01). Median total vitamin D (UVB plus diet) was higher in AB only during summer (8.45 mu g/d (338 IU/d)) compared with KL (SWM = 6.03 mu g/d (241 IU/d), P = 0.04; NEM = 5.35 mu g/d (214 IU/d), P < 0.01), with a comparable intake across the full year (AB=5.75 mu g/d (230 IU/d); KL = 6.15 mu g/d (246 IU/d), P = 0.78). Conclusions: UVB exposure among Asians in their home country is low. For Asians residing at the northerly latitude of Scotland, acquiring vitamin D needs from UVB exposure alone (except in summer) may be challenging due to low ambient UVB in AB (available only from April to October).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据