4.3 Review

The impact of whole-of-diet interventions on depression and anxiety: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 2074-2093

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002614

关键词

Diet; Diet intervention; Depression; Mental health

资金

  1. La Trobe University
  2. Deakin University
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1052865]
  4. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, the NHMRC
  5. Australian Rotary Health
  6. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  7. Ian Potter Foundation
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. University of Melbourne
  10. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  11. Janssen Cilag
  12. Servier
  13. Pfizer
  14. Health Ed
  15. Network Nutrition
  16. Angelini Farmaceutica
  17. Meat and Livestock Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Non-pharmacological approaches to the treatment of depression and anxiety are of increasing importance, with emerging evidence supporting a role for lifestyle factors in the development of these disorders. Observational evidence supports a relationship between habitual diet quality and depression. Less is known about the causative effects of diet on mental health outcomes. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken of randomised controlled trials of dietary interventions that used depression and/or anxiety outcomes and sought to identify characteristics of programme success. Design: A systematic search of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and PyscInfo databases was conducted for articles published between April 1971 and May 2014. Results: Of the 1274 articles identified, seventeen met eligibility criteria and were included. All reported depression outcomes and ten reported anxiety or total mood disturbance. Compared with a control condition, almost half (47 %) of the studies observed significant effects on depression scores in favour of the treatment group. The remaining studies reported a null effect. Effective dietary interventions were based on a single delivery mode, employed a dietitian and were less likely to recommend reducing red meat intake, select leaner meat products or follow a low-cholesterol diet. Conclusions: Although there was a high level of heterogeneity, we found some evidence for dietary interventions improving depression outcomes. However, as only one trial specifically investigated the impact of a dietary intervention in individuals with clinical depression, appropriately powered trials that examine the effects of dietary improvement on mental health outcomes in those with clinical disorders are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据