4.3 Article

Prevalence of iodine inadequacy in Switzerland assessed by the estimated average requirement cut-point method in relation to the impact of iodized salt

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 1333-1342

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002018

关键词

Estimated average requirement; Iodine; Adjusted intake distribution; Iodized salt

资金

  1. Food Safety Department of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the iodine status of Swiss population groups and to evaluate the influence of iodized salt as a vector for iodine fortification. Design: The relationship between 24 h urinary iodine and Na excretions was assessed in the general population after correcting for confounders. Single-day intakes were estimated assuming that 92 % of dietary iodine was excreted in 24 h urine. Usual intake distributions were derived for male and female population groups after adjustment for within-subject variability. The estimated average requirement (EAR) cut-point method was applied as guidance to assess the inadequacy of the iodine supply. Setting: Public health strategies to reduce the dietary salt intake in the general population may affect its iodine supply. Subjects: The study population (1481 volunteers, aged 15 years) was randomly selected from three different linguistic regions of Switzerland. Results: The 24 h urine samples from 1420 participants were determined to be properly collected. Mean iodine intakes obtained for men (n 705) and women (n 715) were 179 (sd 681) mu g/d and 138 (sd 578) mu g/d, respectively. Urinary Na and Ca, and BMI were significantly and positively associated with higher iodine intake, as were men and non-smokers. Fifty-four per cent of the total iodine intake originated from iodized salt. The prevalence of inadequate iodine intake as estimated by the EAR cut-point method was 2 % for men and 14 % for women. Conclusions: The estimated prevalence of inadequate iodine intake was within the optimal target range of 2-3 % for men, but not for women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据