4.3 Article

A case-control study on red meat consumption and risk of stroke among a group of Iranian adults

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 1084-1090

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014001165

关键词

Red meat; Stroke; Diet; Iran

资金

  1. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran [187028 IUMS]
  2. Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We aimed to examine the association between red meat consumption and stroke in a group of Iranian adults. Design: A hospital-based case-control study. Setting: The study included stroke patients and hospital-based controls. Usual dietary intakes of participants were assessed by means of a validated 168-item semi-quantitative FFQ. Total red meat consumption was calculated by summing up the consumption of red, processed and visceral meats. Subjects: One hundred and ninety-five cases were stroke patients hospitalized in the neurology ward and 195 controls were recruited from patients hospitalized in other wards with no history of cerebrovascular diseases or neurological disorders. Results: Participants with stroke were older, more likely to be male and less likely to be obese. Individuals in the highest tertile of red meat intake were 119 % more likely to have stroke (OR= 2.19; 95 % CI 1,33, 3.60) compared with those in the lowest tertile. After controlling for age, sex and total energy intake, the association between red meat consumption and stroke was strengthened (OR = 2.72; 95 % CI 1.53, 4.83). This association remained significant even after further controlling for physical activity and smoking as well as dietary intakes. Additional adjustments for BMI, diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia did not influence the association significantly (OR= 2.51; 95 % CI 1.19, 5.09). Conclusions: Consumption of red meat was associated with greater odds of having stroke in a group of Iranian adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据