4.3 Article

Vegetable variety: an effective strategy to increase vegetable choice in children

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1232-1236

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013002632

关键词

Variety; Vegetables; Fruit and vegetables; Meal composition; Fake food buffet; Children; Food choice; Intervention; Child nutrition; Nudge; Vegetable variety

资金

  1. Swiss Foundation for Nutrition Research (SFEFS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Most children do not meet the recommended intake of vegetables. Variety was identified as a potential factor to increase children's intake of these foods, as it was shown that variety was effective in improving meal composition in adults. Because younger children are suggested to be more responsive to internal satiation signals than to external food-related cues compared with adults, it is not clear whether variety is effective to improve meal composition in 7- to 10-year-old children. Design: Experiment. Setting: Children were assigned one of three different fake food buffets containing pasta, chicken, and either one vegetable (carrots or beans) or two vegetables (carrots and beans). The children were asked to serve themselves a meal that they would like to eat for lunch from the given selection. Subjects: One hundred children (fifty-two boys; mean age 8.8 (SD 1.1) years). Results: Children given the two-vegetable choice served themselves significantly more energy from vegetables (mean 64 (SD 51) kJ, 10.9 (SD 9.4) %) compared with children who were offered only either carrots (mean 37 (SD 25) kJ, 5.9 (SD 6.5) %) or beans (mean 38 (SD 34) kJ, 5.6 (SD 6.3) %). The total energy of the meal was not increased, indicating that children chose a more balanced lunch when offered more vegetables. Conclusions: School-aged children are responsive to food-related cues and variety is effective in increasing their vegetable choice. Serving an assortment of vegetables in school cafeterias might be a simple and effective strategy to improve children's nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据