4.3 Article

Patterns of weight change and progression to overweight and obesity differ in men and women: implications for research and interventions

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1463-1475

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012003801

关键词

Long-term; Weight; Abdominal obesity; Sex

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA [R01-HL-60700, R01-HL-54776, N01-HC-25195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate long-term patterns of weight change and progression to overweight and obesity during adulthood. Design: Prospective study. Changes in mean BMI, waist circumference (WC) and weight were assessed over a mean 26-year follow-up (1971-1975 to 1998-2001). Mean BMI (95% CI) and mean WC (95% CI) of men and women in BMI and age groups were computed. Mean weight change in BMI and age categories was compared using analysis of covariance. Setting: Framingham Heart Study Offspring/Spouse Nutrition Study. Subjects: Men and women (n 2394) aged 20-63 years. Results: During follow-up, increases in BMI (men: 2.2 kg/m(2); women: 3.7 kg/m(2)) and WC (men: 5.7 cm; women: 15.1 cm) were larger in women than men. BMI gains were greatest in younger adults (20-39 years) and smallest in obese older adults (50-69 years). The prevalence of obesity doubled in men (to 33.2%) and tripled in women (to 26.6%). Among normal-weight individuals, abdominal obesity developed in women only. The prevalence of abdominal obesity increased 1.8-fold in men (to 53.0%) and 2.4-fold in women (to 71.2%). Weight gain was greatest in the youngest adults (20-29 years), particularly women. Gains continued into the fifth decade among men and then declined in the sixth decade; in women gains continued into the sixth decade. Conclusions: Patterns of weight change and progression to obesity during adulthood differ in men and women. Preventive intervention strategies for overweight and obesity need to consider age- and sex-specific patterns of changes in anthropometric measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据