4.3 Article

Obesogenic neighbourhoods: the impact of neighbourhood restaurants and convenience stores on adolescents' food consumption behaviours

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 2331-2339

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012000584

关键词

Child and adolescent health; Environmental health; Nutrition and diet

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the relationship between the neighbourhood food environment and dietary intake among adolescents. Design: Cross-sectional design using: (i) a geographic information system to assess characteristics of the neighbourhood food environment and neighbourhood socioeconomic status; (ii) the modified Healthy Eating Index (HEI) to assess participants' overall diet quality; and (iii) generalized linear models to examine associations between HEI and home and school food environmental correlates. Setting: Mid-sized Canadian city in Ontario, Canada. Participants: Grade 7 and 8 students (n 810) at twenty-one elementary schools. Results: Students living in neighbourhoods with a lower diversity of land-use types, compared with their higher diversity counterparts, had higher HEI scores (P < 0.05). Students with more than 1 km between their home and the nearest convenience store had higher HEI scores than those living within 1km (P < 0.01). Students attending schools with a distance further than 1km from the nearest convenience store (P < 0.01) and fast-food outlet (P < 0.05) had higher HEI scores than those within 1 km. Those attending schools with three or more fast-food outlets within 1km had lower HEI scores than those attending schools with no fast-food outlet in the school surroundings (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Close proximity to convenience stores in adolescents' home environments is associated with low HEI scores. Within adolescents' school environments, close proximity to convenience and fast-food outlets and a high density of fast-food outlets are associated with low HEI scores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据