4.3 Article

Iodine-induced goitre and high prevalence of anaemia among Saharawi refugee women

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 1512-1518

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002886

关键词

Excess urinary iodine; Iodine-rich drinking water; Saharawi refuge women; Iron deficiency

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [172226/S30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The main objective was to assess iodine status (thyroid volume (Tvol) and urinary iodine concentration (UIC)) and their determinants in Saharawi refugee women. Design: A cross-sectional survey was performed during January-February 2007. Tvol was measured by ultrasound and iodine concentration was analysed in spot urine samples and in household drinking water. Anthropometry and Hb concentration were measured and background variables were collected using pre-coded questionnaires. Setting: The survey was undertaken in four long-term refugee camps in the Algerian desert. Subjects: Non-pregnant women (n 394), 15-45 years old, randomly selected. Results: Median (25th percentile-75th percentile (P-25-P-75)) UIC was 466 (294-725) mg/l. Seventy-four per cent had UIC above 300mg/l and 46% above 500 mu g/l. Median (P-25-P-75) Tvol was 9.4 (7.4-12.0) ml and the goitre prevalence was 22 %. UIC was positively associated with iodine in drinking water and negatively associated with breast-feeding, and these two variables explained 28% of the variation in UIC. The mean (SD) Hb level was 11.8 (2.4) g/dl. In total 46% were anaemic with 14 %, 25% and 7%, classified with respectively mild, moderate and severe anaemia. Conclusions: The Saharawi women had high UIC, high levels of iodine in drinking water and increased Tvol and probably suffered from iodine-induced goitre. The high prevalence of anaemia is considered to be a severe public health concern. To what extent the excessive iodine intake and the anaemia have affected thyroid function is unknown and should be addressed in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据