4.3 Article

Dietary, behavioural and socio-economic determinants of the metabolic syndrome among adults in Luxembourg: findings from the ORISCAV-LUX study

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 849-859

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002278

关键词

Metabolic syndrome; Diet; Socio-economic determinants; Luxembourg

资金

  1. National Fund of Research (Fond National de Recherche) [784844]
  2. government (Ministry of Health and Ministry of Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of the present research was to investigate the epidemiological profile of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and to explore its potential dietary, behavioural and socio-economic determinants among European adults residing in Luxembourg. Design: Cross-sectional, population-based ORISCAV-LUX survey. Setting: European adults aged 18-69 years residing in Luxembourg. Subjects: A total of 1349 Europid adults, who participated in the ORISCAV-LUX survey, were included in the study. The prevalence of MetS was estimated according to the Revised-Adult Treatment Panel (R-ATPIII) criteria. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the dietary, behavioural and socioeconomic factors independently associated with MetS. Results: The overall prevalence of MetS was 24.7% with significant gender difference (18.5% for women v. 30.8% for men, P<0.0001). Age, male gender, primary level of education, physical inactivity, family history of diabetes and hypertension and inadequate protein intake were identified as significant determinants of MetS, after adjusting for other socio-economic, family medical history and lifestyle factors. Conclusions: MetS is a common condition among Europid adults in Luxembourg and increases dramatically with age, in both genders. Several dietary, socio-economic and behavioural factors explain the disparity observed. These findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive approach to MetS encompassing dietary, lifestyle and socio-economic aspects, both in clinical and community settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据