4.3 Article

Development and evaluation of a method for calculating the Healthy Eating Index-2005 using the Nutrition Data System for Research

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 306-313

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010001655

关键词

Nutrition Data System for Research; Healthy Eating Index; Diet quality; NHANES

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture [58-1950-6019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To develop and evaluate a method for calculating the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) with the widely used Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) based on the method developed for use with the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and Nutrient Dietary Data System (FNDDS) and My Pyramid Equivalents Database (MPED). Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Non-institutionalized, community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and above. Subjects: Two hundred and seventy-one adults participating in the Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS) and 620 age- and race-matched adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2002 (NHANES) were included in the analysis. The HEI-2005 scores were generated using NDSR in GRAS and compared to scores generated using FNDDS and MPED in NHANES. Results: Similar total HEI-2005 scores (mean 62.0 (SE 0.75) in GRAS v. 57.4 (SE 0.55) in NHANES) were estimated, and the individual components most strongly correlated with total score in both samples were compared. Cronbach's coefficient a values of HEI-2005 were 0.52 in GRAS and 0.43 in NHANES. Conclusions: Since NDSR is commonly used for educational purposes, in clinical settings and in nutrition research, it is important to develop methodology for assessing diet quality through the use of HEI-2005 with this dietary analysis software application and its accompanying food and nutrient database. Results from the present study show that HEI-2005 scores can be generated with NDSR using the method described in the present study and the detailed USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion technical report as guidance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据