4.3 Article

Modern organic and broiler chickens sold for human consumption provide more energy from fat than protein

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 400-408

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009991157

关键词

Agriculture; CVD; Mental health; Obesity; n-3 Fatty acids; DHA; Docosapentaenoic acid; MUFA; PUFA; SFA; Carcass fats

资金

  1. Mother and Child Foundation
  2. Letten Foundation
  3. London Metropolitan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In 1976, the Royal College of Physicians and the British Cardiac Society recommended eating less fatty red meat and more poultry instead because it Was lean. However, the situation has changed since that time, with a striking increase in fat content of the standard broiler chicken. The aim of the present study was to report a snapshot of data on fat in chickens now sold to the public. Design: Samples were obtained randomly between 2004 and 2008 from UK supermarkets, farm shops and a football club. The amount of chicken fat was estimated by emulsification and chloroform/methanol extraction. Setting: Food sold in supermarkets and farms in England. Subjects: Chicken samples. Results., The fat energy exceeded that of protein. There has been a loss of n-3 fatty acids. The n-6:n-3 ratio was found to be as high as 9:1, as opposed to the recommendation of about 2:1. Moreover, the TAG level in the meat and whole bird mostly exceeded the proportion of phospholipids, which should be the higher for muscle function. The n-3 fatty acid docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5n-3) was in excess of DHA (22:6n-3). Previous analyses had, as usual for birds, more DHA than DPA. Conclusions: Traditional Poultry and eggs were one of the few land-based Sources of long-chain n-3 fatty acids, especially DHA, which is synthesized from its parent precursor in the green food chain. In view of the obesity epidemic, chickens that provide several times the fat energy compared with protein seem illogical. This type of chicken husbandry needs to be reviewed with regard to its implications for animal welfare and human nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据