4.3 Article

Infant weight gain, duration of exclusive breast-feeding and childhood BMI - two similar follow-up cohorts

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 201-207

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009005874

关键词

Exclusive breast-feeding; Infants; Overweight; Children

资金

  1. Nordforsk, the Nordic Research Board
  2. Icelandic Centre for Research
  3. Danish Research Councils and Fytek

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the association between duration of exclusive breast-feeding (EBF), weight gain in infancy and childhood BMI in two populations with a long duration of EBF. Design: Cohort study with follow-up in childhood. Breast-feeding status was reported monthly during infancy. Weight and length were measured at birth, 2, 6 and 12 months of age, as well as in childhood at 6 or 10 years of age. Setting: Iceland and Denmark. Subjects: Randomly selected healthy newborns from Denmark (n 85) and Iceland (n 100) Results: Infants exclusively breast-fed for <= 2 months gained 348 (95% CI 69, 626) g more weight from 2 to 6 months than infants exclusively breast-fed for 3-4 months (p = 0.009). Weight gain from 6 to 12 months compared with those exclusively breast-fed for >= 5 months (p = 0.008). A greater weight change, in terms of Z-score, between the ages of 2 and 6 months was associated with higher Z-score of childhood BMI, adjusted for birth weight, country and duration EBF (B = 0.49, SE = 0.11, p < 0.001, adj. R-2 = 0.15). However, the association was much stronger in the Icelandic cohort than the Danish one. Conclusions: Although duration of EBF was not associated with childhood BMI in the present study it may modulate growth rate in infancy, which is related to childhood BMI. However, other factors determinative for infant growth also need to be considered when assessing the relationship of early growth and nutrition to childhood overweight, as traditions in complementary food might differ between populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据