4.3 Article

Low calcium intake is associated with increased bone resorption in postmenopausal Japanese women: Yokogoshi Study

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 2366-2370

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009005084

关键词

Bone metabolism; Bone resorption; Calcium intake; Postmenopause

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17590537]
  2. Japan Medical Association
  3. Japan Osteoporosis Foundation
  4. The National Dairy Promotion and Research Association of Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17590537] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Low Ca intake is common among Japanese women, but its effect Oil bone metabolism has not been fully elucidated. The aim Of the present study was to determine the relationship between Ca intake and serum markers of bone turnover ill postmenopausal Japanese women. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: A community setting. Subjects: Subjects were 595 home-dwelling postmenopausal Japanese women. Ca intake was assessed by a validated FFQ, Serum type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTX) and osteocalcin Were measured as markers of bone turnover. The relationships between demographic characteristics, lifestyles, serum Ca, vitamin D and intact serum parathyroid hormone and bone turnover were also assessed. Results: The average age of the subjects was 64.5 (SD 5.8) years and the mean Ca intake was 527 (SD 160) mg/d. Ca intake was significantly associated with serum NTX (P=0.0104); but not with serum osteocalcin. Mean serum NTX concentration in the lowest quartile of Ca intake (<417 mg/d) was significantly higher than in the fourth, referent quartile. Among these Japanese postmenopausal women, very low Ca intake (less than similar to 400 mg/d) was associated with increased bone resorption but not one formation. Conclusions: Increased bone resorption may be one mechanism by which this Ca-depleted population normalizes bone metabolism and prevents osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据