4.3 Article

Diet and pregnancy status in Australian women

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 853-861

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008003212

关键词

Diet; Nutritional requirements; Pregnancy; Women's health

资金

  1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

objective: To investigate and report the diet quality of young Australian women by pregnancy status. Design: Pregnancy Status was defined as pregnant (n 606), trying to conceive (n 454), had a baby in the last 12 months (n 829) and other (n 5597). The Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies was used to calculate diet quality using the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS) methodology. Nutrient intakes were compared with the Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Setting: A population-based cohort participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). Subjects: A nationally representative sample of Australian women, aged 25 to 30 years, who completed Survey 3 of the ALSWH. The 7486 women with biologically plausible energy intake estimates, defined as > 4.5 but < 20.0 MJ/d, were included in the analyses. Results: Pregnancy status was not significantly predictive of diet quality, before or after adjusting for area of residence and socio-economic Status. Pregnant women and those who had given birth in the previous 12 months had marginally higher ARFS (mean (SE): 30.2 (0.4) and 30.2 (0.3), respectively) than 'other' women (29.1 (0.1)). No single food group accounted for this small difference. Across all pregnancy categories there were important nutrients that did not meet the Current nationally recommended levels of intake, including dietary folate and fibre. Conclusion: Women do not appear to consume a wider variety of nutritious foods when planning to become pregnant. or during pregnancy. Many young Australian women are failing to meet key nutrient targets as nationally recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据