4.0 Article

Views on Personalized Medicine: Do the Attitudes of African American and White Prescription Drug Consumers Differ?

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 276-283

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000242199

关键词

African Americans; Focus groups; Genetic testing; Personalized medicine; Race-based prescribing

资金

  1. National Center of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [M01RR00046, UL1RR025747]
  2. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality
  3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [T32-HS-0003220]
  4. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [T32HS000032] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR025747, M01RR000046] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Although recent advances in pharmacogenomics are making possible the use of genetic testing to determine the best medication for patients, little is known about how patients view such procedures. The aims for this study that were developed collaboratively as part of a community-academic partnership are: (1) What are the attitudes and perceptions of prescription drug consumers concerning personalized medicine and genetic testing for drug compatibility and how do they differ between African American and white patients? (2) What are the attitudes and perceptions of patients concerning race-based prescribing and how do they differ between African American and white patients? Methods: We conducted 6 focus groups, 2 with white participants and 4 with African American participants. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to ascertain common themes. Results: Our results suggest that personalized medicine and genetic testing, though not well understood by lay persons, were considered positive advances in medicine. However, participants also voiced concerns about these advances that differed by race. Conclusion: This study points to the need to include perspectives of at-risk communities as we move toward wider use of this technology. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据