4.6 Article

Community-based service provision for the prevention and management of maternal obesity in the North East of England: A qualitative study

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 125, 期 8, 页码 518-524

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.05.004

关键词

Obesity; Community services; Development; Pregnancy; Maternal

资金

  1. Department of Health
  2. Public Health Group North East

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This study was conducted to develop a better understanding of community-based initiatives relating to maternal obesity, and to gain community service providers' views on maternal obesity services and their perceived role in the management and prevention of maternal obesity. Study design: An interpretive constructionist approach using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were carried out with community service providers in the North East of England, UK. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Five dominant themes emerged: community-based obesity services, understanding maternal obesity services, participation in maternal obesity services, challenges in the development of community maternal obesity services, and factors contributing to successful maternal obesity services. Community service providers identified their role in tackling maternal obesity alongside maternity services. Participants identified a lack of community maternal obesity services, distinct training requirements, and felt that a multi-agency approach was likely to be required. Conclusions: Increasing rates of maternal obesity and the relationship between maternal obesity and childhood obesity mean that the preconception, pregnancy and postnatal periods are important and timely stages in the life course for public health intervention. However, current public health and community service provision lacks structured maternal obesity objectives. (C) 2011 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据