4.3 Article

The Protective Role of Racial Identity and Africentric Worldview in the Association Between Racial Discrimination and Blood Pressure

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 509-516

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182583a50

关键词

racial discrimination; racial identity; Africentric worldview; blood pressure; resilience; African Americans

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [SES-0932268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the protective effects of racial identity and Africentric worldview on the association between racial discrimination and blood pressure (BP). Methods: Two hundred ten African American young adults completed questionnaires assessing demographic characteristics, prior racial discrimination experiences, racial identity, and Africentric worldview. Resting BP was assessed before and after completion of the study measures. Results: Racial discrimination was unrelated to BP in the overall sample (systolic BP, p = .444; diastolic BP [DBP],p = .915; mean arterial pressure, p = .774). However, racial identity and Africentric worldview moderated the association between racial discrimination and BP. Racial discrimination was negatively related to DBP for participants who felt that others viewed African Americans less favorably and who endorsed the uniqueness of the African American experience (B = -2.59, standard error [SE] = 1.29, p = .046). These individuals also had the lowest DBP at high levels of racial discrimination. Racial discrimination was positively associated with DBP for individuals with low levels of Africentric orientation (B = 1.43, SE = 0.72, p = .048) but was unrelated to DBP at moderate (B = 0.24, SE = 0.65, p = .718) and high (B = -0.96, SE = 1.01, p = .341) levels of Africentric worldview. Conclusions: Racial and cultural personal characteristics such as racial identity and Africentric orientation may serve an important protective function for BP in African American young adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据