4.3 Article

Locus of control at age 10 years and health outcomes and behaviors at age 30 years: The 1970 British Cohort Study

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 397-403

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816a719e

关键词

personality; intelligence; health outcomes; health behaviors; control beliefs

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U130059821] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U130059821, U1475000002, G0700704B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the relationship between locus of control at age 10 years and self-reported health. outcomes (overweight, obesity, psychological distress, health, and hypertension) and health behaviors (smoking and physical activity) at age 30, controlling for sex, childhood IQ, educational attainment, earnings, and socioeconomic position. Methods: Participants were members of the 1970 British Cohort Study, a national birth cohort. At age 10, 11,563 children took tests to measure locus of control and IQ. At age 30, 7551 men and women (65%) were interviewed about their health and completed a questionnaire about psychiatric morbidity. Results: Men and women with a more internal locus of control score in childhood had a reduced risk of obesity (odds ratio, 95% CI, for a SD increase in locus of control, 0.86, 0.78-0.95), overweight (0.87, 0.82-0.93), fair or poor self-rated health (0.8, 0.81-0.97), and psychological distress (0.86, 0.76-0.95). Women with a more internal locus of control had a reduced risk of high blood pressure (0.84, 0.76-0.92). Associations between childhood IQ and risk of obesity and overweight were weakened by adjustment for internal locus of control. Conclusion: Having a stronger sense of control over one's own life in childhood seems to be a protective factor for some aspects of health in adult life. Sense of control provides predictive power beyond contemporaneously assessed IQ and may partially mediate the association between higher IQ in childhood and later risk of obesity and overweight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据