4.4 Review

Common neurocircuitry mediating drug and fear relapse in preclinical models

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 236, 期 1, 页码 415-437

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-5024-3

关键词

Addiction; Amygdala; Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Extinction; Hippocampus; Prefrontal cortex; PTSD; Reinstatement; Relapse

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01MH065961, R01MH117852, F31MH107113]
  2. McKnight Foundation Memory and Cognitive Disorders Award
  3. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Distinguished Investigator Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Comorbidity of anxiety disorders, stressor- and trauma-related disorders, and substance use disorders is extremely common. Moreover, therapies that reduce pathological fear and anxiety on the one hand, and drug-seeking on the other, often prove short-lived and are susceptible to relapse. Considerable advances have been made in the study of the neurobiology of both aversive and appetitive extinction, and this work reveals shared neural circuits that contribute to both the suppression and relapse of conditioned responses associated with trauma or drug use. Objectives The goal of this review is to identify common neural circuits and mechanisms underlying relapse across domains of addiction biology and aversive learning in preclinical animal models. We focus primarily on neural circuits engaged during the expression of relapse. Key findings After extinction, brain circuits involving the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus come to regulate the expression of conditioned responses by the amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and nucleus accumbens. During relapse, hippocampal projections to the prefrontal cortex inhibit the retrieval of extinction memories resulting in a loss of inhibitory control over fear- and drug-associated conditional responding. Conclusions The overlapping brain systems for both fear and drug memories may explain the co-occurrence of fear and drug-seeking behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据