4.4 Article

Effects of the adenosine A2A antagonist istradefylline on cognitive performance in rats with a 6-OHDA lesion in prefrontal cortex

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 230, 期 3, 页码 345-352

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3158-x

关键词

Cognition; Working memory; Dopamine; Adenosine A(2A) receptor; Istradefylline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale Altered cognitive function is a common feature of both the early and later stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) that involves alterations in cortical dopamine content. Adenosine A(2A) antagonists, such as istradefylline, improve motor function in PD, but their effect on cognitive impairment has not been determined. The present study investigated whether impairment of working memory due to the loss of dopaminergic input into the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is reversed by administration of istradefylline. We also evaluated whether A(2A) antagonist administration modulates dopamine levels in the PFC. Bilateral lesions of the dopaminergic input to the PFC were produced in rats using 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). Cognitive performance was evaluated using an object recognition task and delayed alternation task. The effects of istradefylline, donepezil and methamphetamine on cognitive performance were examined. In addition, the effect of istradefylline on extracellular dopamine levels in the PFC was studied. PFC dopamine levels and cognitive performance were significantly reduced by 6-OHDA lesioning. Istradefylline, donepezil and methamphetamine improved cognitive performance of PFC-lesioned rats. Istradefylline increased dopamine levels in the PFC in both normal and PFC-lesioned rats. PFC dopaminergic input plays an important role in working memory performance. Blockade of A(2A) receptors using istradefylline reverses the changes in cognitive function, and this may be due to an increase in PFC dopamine content. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists not only improve motor performance in PD but may also lead to improved cognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据