4.4 Article

A randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study of the effects of D-cycloserine on craving in cocaine-dependent individuals

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 226, 期 4, 页码 739-746

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2592-x

关键词

Cocaine; Craving; Cue reactivity; Extinction; Reconsolidation; D-Cycloserine

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01DA023188-01A1, 3R01DA023188-02S1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

d-Cycloserine (DCS), a partial glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist, enhances extinction of conditioned fear responding; preliminary data suggest that it may facilitate extinction of drug cue reactivity. This study investigates DCS effects on cocaine cue craving and drug use in cocaine-dependent subjects. Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to receive (1) DCS only, (2) DCS before sessions 1 and 3, placebo (PBO) before session 2, or (3) PBO only 15-min before each of 3 1-h cocaine cue exposure sessions conducted 1 day apart. Craving ratings were obtained before, during, and after sessions. Drug use and cue-induced craving were assessed 1 week after the last cue session. Repeated presentation of cocaine cues resulted in decreased craving both within and between sessions. DCS did not facilitate extinction learning and may have enhanced craving. The group that received three doses of DCS had significantly higher craving than the PBO group at the baseline ratings taken before sessions 2 and 3, as well as significantly higher cue-induced craving at follow-up. The group that received two doses of DCS did not differ from the PBO group. There were no group differences in postextinction cocaine use. The reduction of cocaine cue reactivity in the PBO group suggests that the study procedures were sufficient to produce extinction. Under these conditions, DCS did not facilitate extinction and may have enhanced craving. Further studies of glutamatergic agents and extinction in cocaine dependence should include consideration of procedural variables that could have a major impact on study outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据