4.4 Article

Potentiation of brain stimulation reward by morphine: effects of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 220, 期 1, 页码 215-224

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2469-z

关键词

Morphine; Opioid; Neurokinin; Substance P; Dopamine; Reward; Reinforcement

资金

  1. NIAAA
  2. [R01-AA 018335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale The abuse potential of opioids may be due to their reinforcing and rewarding effects, which may be attenuated by neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonists. Objective This study was conducted to measure the effects of opioid and NK1R blockade on the potentiation of brain stimulation reward (BSR) by morphine using the intracranial self-stimulation method. Methods Adult male C57BL/6J mice (n=15) were implanted with unipolar stimulating electrodes in the lateral hypothalamus and trained to respond for varying frequencies of rewarding electrical stimulation. The BSR threshold (theta(0)) and maximum response rate (MAX) were determined before and after intraperitoneal administration of saline, morphine (1.0-17.0 mg/kg), or the NK1R antagonists L-733,060 (1.0-17.0 mg/kg) and L-703,606 (1.0-17.0 mg/kg). In morphine antagonism experiments, naltrexone (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) or 10.0 mg/kg L-733,060 or L-703,606 was administered 15 min before morphine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) or saline. Results Morphine dose-dependently decreased theta(0) (maximum effect=62% of baseline) and altered MAX when compared to saline. L-703,606 and L-733,060 altered theta(0); 10.0 mg/kg L-733,060 and L-703,606, which did not affect theta(0) or MAX, attenuated the effects of 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg morphine, and 1.0 and 0.3 mg/kg naltrexone blocked the effects of 10.0 mg/kg morphine. Naltrexone given before saline did not affect theta(0) or MAX. Conclusions The decrease in theta(0) by morphine reflects its rewarding effects, which were attenuated by NK1R and opioid receptor blockade. These results demonstrate the importance of substance P signaling during limbic reward system activation by opioids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据