4.4 Article

Age-dependent effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on the serotonergic system one week following treatment

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 221, 期 2, 页码 329-339

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2580-1

关键词

Fluoxetine; Brain development; 5-HT; Behavior; phMRI

资金

  1. Netherlands organization for health research and development [916.86.125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine are increasingly used for the treatment of depression in children. Limited data are, however, available on their effects on brain development and their efficacy remains debated. Moreover, previous experimental studies are seriously hampered in their clinical relevance. The aim of the present study was to investigate putative age-related effects of a chronic treatment with fluoxetine (5 mg/kg, either orally or i.p. for 3 weeks, 1 week washout) using conventional methods (behavioral testing and binding assay using [I-123]beta-CIT) and a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach. Behavior was assessed, as well as serotonin transporter (SERT) availability and function through ex vivo binding assays and in vivo pharmacological MRI (phMRI) with an acute fluoxetine challenge (10 mg/kg oral or 5 mg/kg i.v.) in adolescent and adult rats. Fluoxetine caused an increase in anxiety-like behavior in treated adult, but not adolescent, rats. On the binding assays, we observed increased SERT densities in most cortical brain regions and hypothalamus in adolescent, but not adult, treated rats. Finally, reductions in brain activation were observed with phMRI following treatment, in both adult and adolescent treated animals. Collectively, our data indicate that the short-term effects of fluoxetine on the 5-HT system may be age-dependent. These findings could reflect structural and functional rearrangements in the developing brain that do not occur in the matured rat brain. phMRI possibly will be well suited to study this important issue in the pediatric population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据