4.4 Article

Increased cortisol levels in cognitively challenging situations are beneficial in young but not older subjects

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 201, 期 2, 页码 293-304

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1275-8

关键词

Stress; Cortisol; Episodic memory; Aging; fMRI; Hippocampus

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KFO 112, TP8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptation to stressful situations changes with increasing age. This is also reflected in age-related differences in effects of acute stress on, e.g., episodic memory. Less is known about age-related differences of the cognitive effects of individual stress responses to challenging situations. To investigate the influence of the individual cortisol response (as a marker for the individual stress level) on behavioral and neural measures during a challenging memory paradigm. Twenty young and 12 older subjects were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging during encoding and retrieval of spatial contextual information. Salivary cortisol levels were measured before and after scanning. A multiple regression analysis of behavioral data showed an interaction effect of age and cortisol response on memory for the items and their spatial context during retrieval due to increased accuracy with increasing cortisol responses in young compared to old subjects. During encoding, this was reflected in a positive effect of the cortisol response on prefrontal activity in young but not in older subjects. During retrieval, there was a negative effect of the cortisol response on brain activity in the hippocampus and prefrontal regions in older but not in young subjects. The data suggest an increased efficiency to encode items and their context with increasing cortisol responses in young subjects, and a decreased efficiency to retrieve information with increasing cortisol responses in older subjects. We conclude that neuroendocrine responses are differentially associated with behavioral and neural measures in cognitively challenging situations in young and older volunteers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据