4.4 Article

When we enhance cognition with Adderall, do we sacrifice creativity? A preliminary study

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 202, 期 1-3, 页码 541-547

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1369-3

关键词

Cognition; Creativity; Adderall; Amphetamine; Neuroethics; Enhancement

资金

  1. ONR [N000140710034]
  2. NIH [R01-HD043078, R01-HD055689]
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD055689, R01HD043078] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adderall (mixed amphetamine salts) is used by healthy normal individuals to enhance attention. Research with healthy normal participants and those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder indicate a possible inverse relationship between attentional function and creativity. This raises the possibility that Adderall could decrease creativity in people using it for cognitive enhancement. This study was designed to find out whether Adderall impairs creativity in healthy young adults. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, the effects of Adderall on the performance of 16 healthy young adults were measured on four tests of creativity from the psychological literature: two tasks requiring divergent thought and two requiring convergent thought. Adderall affected performance on the convergent tasks only, in one case enhancing it, particularly for lower-performing individuals, and in the other case enhancing it for the lower-performing and impairing it for higher-performing individuals. The preliminary evidence is inconsistent with the hypothesis that Adderall has an overall negative effect on creativity. Its effects on divergent creative thought cannot be inferred with confidence from this study because of the ambiguity of null results. Its effects on convergent creative thought appear to be dependent on the baseline creativity of the individual. Those in the higher range of the normal distribution may be unaffected or impaired, whereas those in the lower range of the normal distribution experience enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据