4.2 Article

Comparison of Self- and Clinician's Ratings of Personal and Social Performance in Patients with Schizophrenia: The Role of Insight

期刊

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 109-116

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000330260

关键词

Personal and Social Performance self-rating scale; Personal and Social Performance scale; Schizophrenia; Psychosocial functioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with schizophrenia are often markedly impaired in their social functioning, partly independent of symptom severity. Few studies have examined patients' self-reporting of their social functioning, how a patient's self-perspective differs from third-party ratings, and whether or not the patients' self-rating of social functioning is influenced by their awareness of illness. Sampling and Methods: Based on the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale as a clinician-administered scale, a PSP self-rating scale for patients was developed. The study included 42 inpatients with schizophrenia. Instruments were the PSP scale, the PSP self-rating scale, the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale, and the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder. Results: A significant correlation was found between PSP self- and clinician's rating for 'socially useful activities', whereas the other PSP subdimensions as well as the total score were not significantly correlated. For patients with high insight, a significantly positive association emerged with 'disturbing and aggressive behaviour', while there was no significant correlation between PSP self- and clinician's ratings for the patients with poor insight into their disorder. Conclusions: Patients and clinicians only marginally converge on their judgments concerning the patients' psychosocial functioning. Patients' insight may have a moderating role on the approximation of agreement between self- and third-party ratings. Results are discussed in line with the present literature regarding the accuracy of self-awareness in schizophrenia. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据