4.5 Article

Depression and oxidative damage to lipids

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 1356-1362

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.03.010

关键词

Depression; Oxidative damage; Lipid damage; Atherosclerosis; 8-Isoprostaglandin-F-2 alpha; Comorbidity

资金

  1. American Heart Association (Dallas, TX, USA)
  2. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (Great Neck, NY, USA)
  3. Heart a Stroke Foundation of Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depression is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Oxidative damage to lipids is one of the key early events in the etiology of atherosclerosis, the pathologic condition that underlies these diseases. The current study examines the pathophysiological consequences of depression by comparing serum levels of F-2 alpha-isoprostanes (8-iso-PGF(2 alpha)), a biomarker of oxidative damage to lipids, in a group of depressed individuals (n = 73) and a matched comparison group (n = 72). The depressed group had significantly higher levels of serum 8-iso-PGF(2 alpha), while controlling for age, gender, race, years of education, daily smoking, number of alcoholic drinks per week, average amount of physical activity per week, and body mass index. Analyses using interviewer ratings on the Hamilton Scale revealed that, within the depressed cohort, there was no significant association between the severity of symptoms and levels of 8-iso-PGF(2 alpha), suggesting this is a threshold rather than a dose response relationship. Results extend on our knowledge of depression and oxidative damage to lipids. In conclusion, oxidative damage to lipid molecules may represent a common pathophysiological mechanism by which depressed individuals become more vulnerable to atherosclerosis and its clinical sequelae. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据