4.5 Article

Maternal prenatal licorice consumption alters hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis function in children

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 1587-1593

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.010

关键词

11Beta-HSD2; Children; Cortisol; Glycyrrhizin; Licorice; Programming

资金

  1. Juho Vainio Foundation
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  3. European Science Foundation (EuroSTRESS)
  4. Finnish Academy
  5. Medical Research Council [G0700704B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexposure to glucocorticoids has been proposed as a mechanism by which prenatal adversity 'programs' the function of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical axis (HPAA), thereby increasing the risk of adult diseases. Glycyrrhizin, a natural constituent of licorice, potently inhibits 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2, the feto-placental barrier to the higher maternal cortisol levels. We studied if maternal consumption of glycyrrhizin in licorice associates with HPAA function in children. Diurnal salivary cortisol and salivary cortisol during the Trier Social Stress Test for Children (TSST-C) were measured in children (n = 321, mean age = 8.1, SD = 0.3 years) whose mothers consumed varying levels of glycyrrhizin in licorice during pregnancy; exposure-level groups were labeled high (>= 500 mg/week), moderate (250-499 mg/week) and zero low (0-249 mg/week). In comparison to the zero low exposure group, children in the high exposure group had 19.2% higher salivary cortisol awakening peak, 33.1% higher salivary cortisol awakening slope, 15.4% higher salivary cortisol awakening area under the curve (AUC), 30.8% higher baseline TSST-C salivary cortisol levels, and their salivary cortisol levels remained high throughout the TSST-C protocol (P-values <0.05). These effects appeared dose-related. Our findings lend support to prenatal 'programming' of HPAA function by overexposure to glucocorticoids. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据