4.4 Review

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of graphitic carbon nanomaterials doped with heteroatoms

期刊

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 177-192

出版社

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.6.17

关键词

carbon nanotubes; core level photoemission; graphene; substitutional doping; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M 1497, P 28322] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28322] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P 28322] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is one of the best tools for studying the chemical modification of surfaces, and in particular the distribution and bonding of heteroatom dopants in carbon nanomaterials such as graphene and carbon nanotubes. Although these materials have superb intrinsic properties, these often need to be modified in a controlled way for specific applications. Towards this aim, the most studied dopants are neighbors to carbon in the periodic table, nitrogen and boron, with phosphorus starting to emerge as an interesting new alternative. Hundreds of studies have used XPS for analyzing the concentration and bonding of dopants in various materials. Although the majority of works has concentrated on nitrogen, important work is still ongoing to identify its precise atomic bonding configurations. In general, care should be taken in the preparation of a suitable sample, consideration of the intrinsic photoemission response of the material in question, and the appropriate spectral analysis. If this is not the case, incorrect conclusions can easily be drawn, especially in the assignment of measured binding energies into specific atomic configurations. Starting from the characteristics of pristine materials, this review provides a practical guide for interpreting X-ray photoelectron spectra of doped graphitic carbon nanomaterials, and a reference for their binding energies that are vital for compositional analysis via XPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据