4.7 Article

Prevalence of suicide attempt in individuals with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of observational surveys

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 1691-1704

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718002301

关键词

Major depressive disorder; meta-analysis; suicide attempt

资金

  1. University of Macau [MYRG2015-00230-FHS, MYRG2016-00005-FHS]
  2. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2016YFC1307200]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support [ZYLX201607]
  4. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan [DFL20151801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Suicide attempt (SA), which is one of the strongest predictors of completed suicide, is common in major depressive disorder (MDD) but its prevalence across epidemiological studies has been mixed. The aim of this comprehensive meta-analysis was to examine the pooled prevalence of SA in individuals with MDD. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from their commencement date until 27 December 2017. Original studies containing data on prevalence of SA in individuals with MDD were analyzed. Results. In all, 65 studies with a total of 27 340 individuals with MDD were included. Using the random effects model, the pooled lifetime prevalence of SA was 31% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-34%], 1-year prevalence was 8% (95% CI 3-14%) and 1-month prevalence was 24% (95% CI 15-34%). Subgroup analyses revealed that the lifetime prevalence of SA was significantly associated with the patient setting, study region and income level, while the 1-month prevalence of SA was associated with only the patient setting. Conclusion. This meta-analysis confirmed that SA was common in individuals with MDD across the world. Careful screening and appropriate interventions should be implemented for SA in the MDD population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据