4.7 Article

Noradrenergic-glucocorticoid modulation of emotional memory encoding in the human hippocampus

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2167-2176

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291711000183

关键词

Cortisol; emotion; fMRI; hippocampus; memory; noradrenaline; stress

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [HU1302/2-2]
  2. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research and Technology of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MIWFT)
  3. University of Bonn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Current rodent models emphasize the joint action of the stress mediators noradrenaline (NE) and cortisol (CORT) in conferring a memory advantage of emotional over neutral stimuli. Method. Using a pharmacological strategy of tackling this stress-related mechanism to enhance human episodic (autobiographical) memory, we measured amygdala-hippocampal responses during encoding of emotional and neutral stimuli with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 51 healthy subjects under four pharmacological conditions in a double-blind parallel group design: (i) placebo; (ii) the NE-reuptake inhibitor reboxetine (4 mg); (iii) hydrocortisone (synthetic CORT) (30 mg); or (iv) both agents in combination. Results. Differential drug effects were found in the left hippocampus, whereas hydrocortisone alone selectively decreased hippocampal responses to emotional relative to neutral stimuli, reboxetine potentiated hippocampal responses to these stimuli. Importantly, the inhibitory influence of hydrocortisone was reversed by co-administration of reboxetine. Conclusions. Our results imply that stress levels of CORT alone attenuate hippocampal responses to emotional stimuli, an effect possibly related to a regulatory negative feedback loop. However, when simultaneously elevated to stress levels, NE and CORT act together to synergistically enhance hippocampal activity during encoding of emotional stimuli, a mechanism that may turn maladaptive under circumstances of traumatic stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据