4.7 Article

A comparison of neurocognitive impairment in younger and older adults with major depression

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 725-733

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708004042

关键词

Depression; geriatric; late-life; neuropsychology; unipolar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Neurocognitive impairment is a well-recognized feature of depression that has been reported in younger and older adults. Similar deficits occur with ageing and it is unclear whether the greater deficits in late-life depression are in ageing-related phenomenon or due to a difference in the nature of late-life depression itself. We hypothesized that ageing alone would not fully explain the increased neurocognitive impairment in late-life depression but that differences in the illness explain the greater decrements in memory and executive function. Method. Comparison of the neuropsychological performance of younger (<60 years) and older (>= 60 years) adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy comparison subjects. Scores for each depression group were normalized against their respective age-matched control group and the primary comparisons were oil four neurocognitive domains: (i) attention and executive function; (ii) verbal learning and memory; (iii) visuospatial learning and memory; and (iv) motor speed. Results. We recruited 75 subjects with MDD [<60 years (n=44), >= 60 years (n=31)] and 82 psychiatrically healthy comparison subjects [<60 years (n=42), >= 60 years (n=40)]. The late-life depression group had greater impairment in verbal learning and memory and motor speed but not of in executive function. The two depressed groups did not differ in depression severity, global cognitive function, intelligence or education. Conclusions. Late-life depression is associated with more severe impairment in verbal learning and memory and motor speed than depression in earlier adult life and this is not due to ageing alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据